Favre ?

293 replies [Last post]
Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891
Printer-friendly version

Biggest stroke in the history of American Sports ?

0
Your rating: None
__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

B24
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 6 min ago. Offline
Joined: 07/08/2008
Posts: 3549

A source close to Brett Favre said the quarterback, pending a physical, will sign a contract with the Minnesota Vikings for between $10 million to $12 million, according to ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen.

10-12mm????  Seriously??  For what?
 
Damn.  They should sign Flutie as a backup for $1mm.

__________________

"I find your lack of faith disturbing. -Darth Vadar

Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891

It is unreal. He doesn't want to put in the effort or the work that would involve training camp and they are still paying him that much. This is exactly why the Packers wanted to move on. He wasn't working out in the off season and before that last year in Green Bay he had sucked for 3 or 4 years. He blew last year in the 2nd Half because he wore down. So annoying.

__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

chief123
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 10/28/2008
Posts: 952

I think he is money.. seriously Sage or Tavaris.. as for references from last year.. you are comparing Thomas Jones to Adrian Peterson?? Also this is the same system he ran for forever in GB...

At least 2 round of playoffs... nobody else is in the division..or NFC.. Giants-no offense, eli is a joke....Eagles-no defense.....Arizona- the nfc curse of losing super bowls....Saints- no defense.... Carolina- everybodys favorite sleeper, every year....Chicago- who does cutler throw to Devin hester..really?.....Green Bay- good luck installing a 3-4 with the wrong personnel...

Am I missing a good team?

__________________

Are you watching closely?-Alfred Borden

henryhill
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 26 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 08/23/2007
Posts: 248

Eagles & G-Men will be good.  Packers 3-4 looked very good last week against (cough) Cleveland.  Favre will give you 4-5 great games, 4-5 ok games and he will lose 4 for you.  It wouldn't surprise me if Favre got hurt this year and ended his game streak. 

__________________

Henry...he's a goodfella

chief123
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 10/28/2008
Posts: 952

Seriously against the Browns, who have no qb, no rb, no rec and te.? I think the Vick thing will bite philly, that guy lied to everybody the first time around, people don't change....

The benefit that favre is going to get is Adrian Peterson(not a viking fan, Titans fan) the defenses are either going to have to play man-man(which favre will pick apart) or a zone of sorts, then Adrian Peterson will have his 2,000yds... This is a much better team then the jets and has a much better rb than he had his last year with GB when they did so well, and he will be inside.

__________________

Are you watching closely?-Alfred Borden

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

chief123 wrote:
I think he is money.. seriously Sage or Tavaris.. as for references from last year.. you are comparing Thomas Jones to Adrian Peterson?? Well not only Thomas Jones.  He also had Leon Washington who rushed for 500 yds and 6 tds plus 37 receptions for 2 more td's. At least 2 round of playoffs (No way!)... nobody else is in the division..or NFC.. Giants-no offense, eli is a joke (Brandon Jacobs is a BEAST!  And thats hard to admit as an Eagles fan.  Bradshaw will get alot of carries too.  Eli is a joke though)....Eagles-no defense (Philly had the number THREE defense in the NFL last year!  We lost Dawkins which hurts, but he was bad in coverage last year w/his aging legs.  Asante Samuel, Ellis Hobbs, Sheldon Brown, Trent Cole, Mike Patterson...we're still good!).....Arizona- the nfc curse of losing super bowls (Agree)....Saints- no defense (Agree).... Carolina- everybodys favorite sleeper, every year (Not a sleeper anymore, just a boring team that has good fundamentals, until Delhomme chokes on his Chunky Soup)....Chicago- who does cutler throw to Devin hester..really?.....Green Bay- good luck installing a 3-4 with the wrong personnel... Am I missing a good team?
 
Cowboys.  Don't discount Romo, Barber, Witten, Williams, Ware, Spears and Co.. 

 
 

Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891

Vikings would have made the playoffs no matter who was playing QB. My point is that hes an ego maniac who loves the spotlight. Guy has been lazy for years and just wants to play in the games with little effort and the F'in media follows him around like he is Jesus Christ.

__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

chief123
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 10/28/2008
Posts: 952

I don't count the cowboys, because Romo is terrible, especially in the clutch.. Barber will never make it for a full year, though i do like the other guy... I don't trust their secondary or their offensive coordinator.

Ron, you are right they would have made the playoffs, like they did last year, but the goal isn't to make the playoffs, just like the goal isn't to produce less than $200K... I think Favre is better than what they had.. It's like replacing a $80K account with a $500K account, yeah it's not a MIL but still better than the 80K, and sure it comes with additional headaches but the increased income is worth it.

__________________

Are you watching closely?-Alfred Borden

Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891

I am not saying it is the wrong move for the team. I am saying Brett Favre as a man is a complete ****** bag.

__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

anonymous
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 09/29/2005
Posts: 2810

I think that it's probably pretty hard to be one of the best in the world at something and not be an egomaniac, or at least, be portrayed like one to some extent. 
 
The guy is old and beat up.  It only makes sense that if he was going to play this year to do it in the way that is easiest on his body.   That means avoiding training camp.  It also is going to mean not practicing all that much during the season and getting special treatment.  If someone was going to pay be $12 million to be that kind of ******, I'll take the job.

Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891

I am fine with that, but tell it like it is. Make a decision and be honest about your intentions. Don't go back and forth for 3 straight off seasons leaving 3 different franchises hanging in the wind. Jay Cutler has been torched by the media from what he did, but when it comes to Favre everyone strokes his sack. It is unreal.

__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

Still@jones
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 34 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 03/22/2009
Posts: 535

I like giving old players one more chance...and that's why I'm a Raider's Fan.

__________________

B-Bye...

LA Broker
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 day 21 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 172

Ron, I think you are just still upset about Favre ripping the Bears apart in the 90's.  Favre and Cutler are not the same case.  Favre never forced his way out of Green Bay.  He was pressured to make up his mind after 07 and retired.  When he had a change of heart they said "we don't want you back, the train has left the station".  He never missed a game for that team playing through pain.  Never held out for a bigger contract and even took managements side when others held out like Sterling Sharpe and Javon Walker.  Cutler forced his way out because his feelings were hurt.  I know the back and fourth is a little much but it does not make him a bad guy, just has a hard time hanging it up for good.   A lot of guys in normal jobs go through this when they retire, multiply this by 100 playing pro football and you can imagine how hard it must be to walk away for good.  Ron, I agree with most of the things you post here, but not when it comes to Favre.  Asset Allocation = Good, Brett Favre = Even better, they both worked out well in the 90's and they both will make a great comeback story in 2009!

__________________

winning isn't everything it's the only thing

Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891

I actually had a ton of respect for Favre until the last few off seasons. A large majority of the Bears fans I know had grown to respect his skills and toughness even though he was beating our teams head in. I think he has gotten lazy the last few years, Green Bay saw that happening and called him out on it. Then he tried turning the tables on management. What Favre doesn't realize is coaches and GM's are trying to put together careers in a cut throat industry and as they try to prepare he is off fishing in Mississippi. It isn't fair to the teams.

__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

Ron 15
Newbie
User offline. Last seen 44 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 08/26/2009
Posts: 5

Favre is kidding himself, he's going to finally retire on such an awful note its going to make it hard for people to remember him in his good years. 

chief123
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 10/28/2008
Posts: 952

Isn't there a double edge sword in professional sports.. Leave to early (Barry Sanders) and we are mad and wonder why... Stay too long (Favre/Shaq) we are mad and wonder why.. But don't they have the opportunity to redeem themselves by doing something great.. For example if Shaq and Lebron win the NBA championship this year or if Favre leads the vikings to the superbowl. In 3-5 years no one will remember anyways(like when Montana finished his career as a Chief, or Jordan a wizard, Karl Malone on the lakers, Gary Payton on the lakers, heat). Sure we remember, but don't really care that they did

__________________

Are you watching closely?-Alfred Borden

Indyone
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005
Posts: 3427

Favre is a ******.  I don't care about the Packers or the Vikings...neither is my team.  I just have no respect for an aging prom queen that (1) can't admit he is too lazy to do training camp and (2) chooses a team at least partially to give his former team the finger.  What an ass he is.  I hope he gets sacked 16 times when the Vikings play the Pack.

__________________

"Independence is like the Berlin Wall. People are only jumping in one direction." - Philip Palaveev - November 2005. "You are never free...unless you are independent..." - Indyone - May 2005.

Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891

Clap

__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

chief123 wrote:
Isn't there a double edge sword in professional sports.. Leave to early (Barry Sanders) and we are mad and wonder why... Stay too long (Favre/Shaq) we are mad and wonder why.. But don't they have the opportunity to redeem themselves by doing something great.. For example if Shaq and Lebron win the NBA championship this year or if Favre leads the vikings to the superbowl. In 3-5 years no one will remember anyways(like when Montana finished his career as a Chief, or Jordan a wizard, Karl Malone on the lakers, Gary Payton on the lakers, heat). Sure we remember, but don't really care that they did

 
I wouldn't lump Shaq in the Favre category.  Shaq's never retired or led the media to believe he was done.  Shaq doesn't have any "redeeming" to do, he won a title 3 years ago and 3 titles prior to that.  Favre hasn't sniffed a title in 13 years, and in recent history has been the key reason why they haven't sniffed a title (OT interception in '03 vs. Eagles in playoff loss, OT interception in '07 vs. Giants in NFC title game loss, 4 INT's vs. Vikings in '04 playoff loss, 6 INT's vs Rams in '01 playoff loss, 2 INT's and a lost fumble vs. Falcons in '02 playoff loss).  He was DIRECTLY at fault for all 5 playoff eliminations this decade alone. 
 
Montana and Favre are unrelated because Montana was traded to KC and went to 2 playoffs in his 2 seasons in KC including the AFC championship game, and he made the Pro-Bowl in '93.  Jordan is Jordan.  He invented the art of the graceful comeback, unlike Favre who has Sugar Ray Leonard apparently as his life coach.

chief123
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 10/28/2008
Posts: 952

3rdyrp2 wrote:
chief123 wrote:
Isn't there a double edge sword in professional sports.. Leave to early (Barry Sanders) and we are mad and wonder why... Stay too long (Favre/Shaq) we are mad and wonder why.. But don't they have the opportunity to redeem themselves by doing something great.. For example if Shaq and Lebron win the NBA championship this year or if Favre leads the vikings to the superbowl. In 3-5 years no one will remember anyways(like when Montana finished his career as a Chief, or Jordan a wizard, Karl Malone on the lakers, Gary Payton on the lakers, heat). Sure we remember, but don't really care that they did

 
I wouldn't lump Shaq in the Favre category.  Shaq's never retired or led the media to believe he was done.  Shaq doesn't have any "redeeming" to do, he won a title 3 years ago and 3 titles prior to that.  Favre hasn't sniffed a title in 13 years, and in recent history has been the key reason why they haven't sniffed a title (OT interception in '03 vs. Eagles in playoff loss, OT interception in '07 vs. Giants in NFC title game loss, 4 INT's vs. Vikings in '04 playoff loss, 6 INT's vs Rams in '01 playoff loss, 2 INT's and a lost fumble vs. Falcons in '02 playoff loss).  He was DIRECTLY at fault for all 5 playoff eliminations this decade alone. 
 
Montana and Favre are unrelated because Montana was traded to KC and went to 2 playoffs in his 2 seasons in KC including the AFC championship game, and he made the Pro-Bowl in '93.  Jordan is Jordan.  He invented the art of the graceful comeback, unlike Favre who has Sugar Ray Leonard apparently as his life coach.

When I referred to shaq, I meant about staying past their prime(he can barely make it through half a season now). I will conceed he has more titles, but I think that is only because in basketball you can win a title with 2 really good players, and then some role players (Kobe/Shq, Jordan/Pippen, KG/Pierce) where as in football you need a lot more talent overall(or barry sanders would have had a ring by now).

On the interceptions for Favre, he is a gunslinger(is only derrogatory when he plays poorly) and you have to live with that. Also I think the caliber of receivers he has has been very poor considering this era.. Because when I think of top 25 recievers of the past 20 years, Donald Driver, Javon Walker, Antonio Freeman and Robert Brooks don't cut it... Same as RB, Ryan Grant is ok(maybe not even), but Edgar Bennet,Dorsey Levens, Ahman Green(for maybe 2 years)... I think there is a reason for the interceptions, he has never had talent around him(Brady to Randy Moss, Manning to Harrison, Montana to Rice etc.)..

I think this year will be interesting.. still has no wr, but does have the best rb in the league

__________________

Are you watching closely?-Alfred Borden

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

chief123 wrote:
On the interceptions for Favre, he is a gunslinger(is only derrogatory when he plays poorly) and you have to live with that. Also I think the caliber of receivers he has has been very poor considering this era.. Because when I think of top 25 recievers of the past 20 years, Donald Driver, Javon Walker, Antonio Freeman and Robert Brooks don't cut it... Same as RB, Ryan Grant is ok(maybe not even), but Edgar Bennet,Dorsey Levens, Ahman Green(for maybe 2 years)... I think there is a reason for the interceptions, he has never had talent around him(Brady to Randy Moss, Manning to Harrison, Montana to Rice etc.)..

 
Ahhh man, I'm gonna start calling you John Madden for all the excuses you have for Favre, lmao! 
 
Driver, Walker, Freeman, Brooks and I include Greg Jennings for 2007, combined for 22,250+ yards and 168 TD's in their career w/Favre, also 5 Pro Bowls and 2 All-Pro seasons.  Not to mention Bubba Franks and Mark Chmura who combined for 6 Pro Bowls, 2 All-Pro's, 49 TD's and 4,500 yds, and their careers as full time starters lasted about 2/3 of Favre's GB career.
 
For the RB's, we have 5 Pro Bowls and 3 All-Pro selections between Green, Bennett and Levens.  9 1,000+ yd seasons and 141 TD's.  Hard to say those guys were schmucks. 

Ron 14
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 07/10/2008
Posts: 1891

You forgot Sterling Sharpe his first few years. Without Sharpe Favre wouldn't have been allowed to continue starting. All completions were to Sharpe or the other team! Now there is a report that Favre has a cracked Rib. The media is going to be blowing him about "what a warrior",!!!

__________________

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries." - President Barry

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

Ohhh yea, Sterling Sharpe!!!!  Add 3 Pro Bowls, 3 All-Pro's, 4,000 yds and 42 more TD's to my previous total.

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

My god I hope Ron Jaworski has a towel to wipe all the Favre juice off his face after the game tonight. Anyone else notice this?

chief123
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 10/28/2008
Posts: 952

3rdyrp2 wrote:
chief123 wrote:
On the interceptions for Favre, he is a gunslinger(is only derrogatory when he plays poorly) and you have to live with that. Also I think the caliber of receivers he has has been very poor considering this era.. Because when I think of top 25 recievers of the past 20 years, Donald Driver, Javon Walker, Antonio Freeman and Robert Brooks don't cut it... Same as RB, Ryan Grant is ok(maybe not even), but Edgar Bennet,Dorsey Levens, Ahman Green(for maybe 2 years)... I think there is a reason for the interceptions, he has never had talent around him(Brady to Randy Moss, Manning to Harrison, Montana to Rice etc.)..

 
Ahhh man, I'm gonna start calling you John Madden for all the excuses you have for Favre, lmao! 
 
Driver, Walker, Freeman, Brooks and I include Greg Jennings for 2007, combined for 22,250+ yards and 168 TD's in their career w/Favre, also 5 Pro Bowls and 2 All-Pro seasons.  Not to mention Bubba Franks and Mark Chmura who combined for 6 Pro Bowls, 2 All-Pro's, 49 TD's and 4,500 yds, and their careers as full time starters lasted about 2/3 of Favre's GB career.
 
For the RB's, we have 5 Pro Bowls and 3 All-Pro selections between Green, Bennett and Levens.  9 1,000+ yd seasons and 141 TD's.  Hard to say those guys were schmucks. 

 
I am not quite on Madden's level... but close... I was simply stating that he has par talent, not sub par, but certainly not superb.. I think those guys wouldn't have been in the league without Favre(sterling gets an exception, but they weren't together that long, by the way sterlings brother looks like Mr. Ed)
 
Montana had rice and taylor and roger craig, the greenbay players don't sniff those guys. 

__________________

Are you watching closely?-Alfred Borden

LA Broker
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 day 21 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 172

I think the reason most "talking heads" type for the NFL like Favre because they appreciate the kind of competitor he is.  He never played for the money but because he loved the game.  He always gave honest interviews (which is part of being a professional) never got arrested and played hurt (alot).  Sure the back and fourth the last few years was kind of old, but it should not take away what he gave the Packers and the NFL.  Look at Brandon Marshall, Mike Vick, Stallworth, ect, ect..the list goes on, these are the bad guys, not a 40 year old who loves to play but is not sure his body will hold up an entire season.  I would not be surprised if down the road Manning or Brady have the same issues.  More guys would do the same thing but usually they are forced out of the league where Brett was recruited.  (Hey Ron, how did you like Denvers reaction to Culver?  I wonder how Green Bay fans will be?)

__________________

winning isn't everything it's the only thing

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

chief123 wrote:
Montana had rice and taylor and roger craig, the greenbay players don't sniff those guys. 

 
John Taylor - 2 Pro Bowls, 0 All-Pro's, 2 1,000 yd seasons (None over 1,100 yds), 347 recds, 5,598 career yds, 43 TD's
 
Antonio Freeman - 1 Pro Bowl, 1 All-Pro, 3 1,000 yd seasons (2 over 1,200 yds), 477 recs, 7,251 career yds, 61 TD's
 
History looks fonder on players who are older.  History hasn't had a chance to look back on Antonio Freeman yet, mainly because he didn't have that "signature play" like Taylor did.
 
I wouldn't put Craig up on that high of a pedastal.  He's not in the H.O.F. and it can be argued that because he played in Walsh's West Coast Offense, which predicates itself on short passes and looking to the check-down receiver, is why he had such good receiving numbers.  He only had one rushing year over 1,100 yds.

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

LA Broker wrote:
I think the reason most "talking heads" type for the NFL like Favre because they appreciate the kind of competitor he is.  He never played for the money but because he loved the game.  He always gave honest interviews (which is part of being a professional) never got arrested and played hurt (alot).  Sure the back and fourth the last few years was kind of old, but it should not take away what he gave the Packers and the NFL.  Look at Brandon Marshall, Mike Vick, Stallworth, ect, ect..the list goes on, these are the bad guys, not a 40 year old who loves to play but is not sure his body will hold up an entire season.  I would not be surprised if down the road Manning or Brady have the same issues.

 
I'll agree that guys like Jon Gruden and John Madden will appreciate the kind of competitor he is, but when you say "talking heads" you are also including guys like Tony Kornheiser and Mike Greenberg and Bob Ryan, etc., sportswriters and radio hosts who have no past playing experience and no reason to appreciate one persons "competitive fire" over another. 
 
The back and forth over the past couple years will take away from what he gave the Packers, as far as history is concerned.  What he did doesn't compare to any athlete of our lifetime.  Nobody has let a situation spiral out of control the way he has.  20 years from now statheads will have his records and "will-to-win", and "ability to make plays" be the first thing they think of when talking about Favre, but not people that follow the game everyday.  I was tired of his to-retire-or-not-to-retire act 3 years ago, before he even retired!  Every offseason since '03 its been a battle for him.  Again, this happens to no one else.  Manning and Brady won't have the same problem, just as the rest of the greats haven't had the same problem.  Brady has a life outside football, as does Manning.  The public has to suffer because Brett Favre can't find anything to do outside of a football field other than weed-whack and hop on a tractor.  And because of that, the Vikings fans get to see an overpaid has-been take over their team for a mere $12 million and see their season end surely on an untimely Favre interception in a playoff game.  But hey, at least the hillbilly is gonna have a blast while he's doing it!
 
LA Broker wrote:
More guys would do the same thing but usually they are forced out of the league where Brett was recruited.

 
He was recruited because anyone with a brain knows if you offer him a couple newspaper headlines, excused absence from training camp, a ride home from the airport and the starting qb position he'll unretire.  Others don't get recruited because teams know when they retire they actually mean it. 

iceco1d
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 1 week 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 12/04/2007
Posts: 3823

3rdyrp2 - you are on a roll!  LOL

3rdyrp2
Senior Member
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/13/2008
Posts: 823

iceco1d wrote:
3rdyrp2 - you are on a roll!  LOL

 
Haha, thanks.  You'd think the guy had a one night stand w/my sister or something.  But no, he's never done a thing to me and may actually be the salt of the earth.